Re: Elusive segfault with 9.3.5 & query cancel
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Elusive segfault with 9.3.5 & query cancel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54824A8C.8080904@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Elusive segfault with 9.3.5 & query cancel (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/5/14, 5:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 12/05/2014 02:41 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: >> Perhaps we should also officially recommend production servers be setup >> to create core files. AFAIK the only downside is the time it would take >> to write a core that's huge because of shared buffers, but perhaps >> there's some way to avoid writing those? (That means the core won't help >> if the bug is due to something in a buffer, but that seems unlikely >> enough that the tradeoff is worth it...) > > Not practical in a lot of cases. For example, this user was unwilling > to enable core dumps on the production replicas because writing out the > 16GB of shared buffers they had took over 10 minutes in a test. Which is why I wondered if there's a way to avoid writing out shared buffers... But at least getting a stack trace would be a big start. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: