Re: better architecture?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: better architecture? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 546E0737.2060705@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | better architecture? (zach cruise <zachc1980@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: better architecture?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/19/2014 05:58 PM, zach cruise wrote: > i need some advice: > > 1. for our small business, i have a master (dev) - slave (prod) setup. > i develop using the master. i get data from other people's dev > (mssql) databases. i also get data from their prod (mssql) databases. i > replicate everything on slave. > > apps using the master can connect only to dev databases, and apps using > the slave can connect only to prod databases. so when it's time to go > from dev to prod, i simply change that connection. no restart. > > comments? Yes I am confused. What replication method are you using? The built in methods, Slony. Bucardo, etc? The production users cannot enter or update records? If you have replication set up master -> slave, how can there be a difference between the two? Not sure where the mssql databases into this? > > 2. what happens if master-slave are rebooted at different times? > > 3. i also need to auto-promote slave to master if master fails (without > using repmgr or postgres-r or even postgres-xl). how? Answers for 2 & 3 are dependent on answers to the above questions. > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: