Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 546C2F34.1000901@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
(2014/11/18 18:27), Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Etsuro Fujita > <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp <mailto:fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>> wrote: > (2014/11/17 19:36), Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > Here are my comments about the patch fscan_reltargetlist.patch > 2. Instead of using rel->reltargetlist, we should use the tlist > passed > by caller. This is the tlist expected from the Plan node. For > foreign > scans it will be same as rel->reltargetlist. Using tlist would > make the > function consistent with create_*scan_plan functions. > I disagree with that for the reasons mentioned below: > > * For a foreign scan, tlist is *not* necessarily the same as > rel->reltargetlist (ie, there is a case where tlist contains all > user attributes while rel->reltargetlist contains only attributes > actually needed by the query). In such a case it'd be inefficient > to use tlist rather than rel->reltargetlist. > create_foreignscan_plan() is called from create_scan_plan(), which > passes the tlist. The later uses function use_physical_tlist() to decide > which targetlist should be used (physical or actual). As per code below > in this function > > 485 /* > 486 * We can do this for real relation scans, subquery scans, > function scans, > 487 * values scans, and CTE scans (but not for, eg, joins). > 488 */ > 489 if (rel->rtekind != RTE_RELATION && > 490 rel->rtekind != RTE_SUBQUERY && > 491 rel->rtekind != RTE_FUNCTION && > 492 rel->rtekind != RTE_VALUES && > 493 rel->rtekind != RTE_CTE) > 494 return false; > 495 > 496 /* > 497 * Can't do it with inheritance cases either (mainly because > Append > 498 * doesn't project). > 499 */ > 500 if (rel->reloptkind != RELOPT_BASEREL) > 501 return false; > > For foreign tables as well as the tables under inheritance hierarchy it > uses the actual targetlist, which contains only the required columns IOW > rel->reltargetlist (see build_path_tlist()) with nested loop parameters > substituted. So, it never included unnecessary columns in the > targetlist. Maybe I'm missing something, but I think you are overlooking the case for foreign tables that are *not* under an inheritance hierarchy. (Note that the rtekind for foreign tables is RTE_RELATION.) Thanks, Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: