Re: Bug? {? = CALL insert_page_segment (?, ?)}
От | Inoue, Hiroshi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug? {? = CALL insert_page_segment (?, ?)} |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54649A01.2080303@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug? {? = CALL insert_page_segment (?, ?)} (Nils Gösche <cartan@cartan.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug? {? = CALL insert_page_segment (?, ?)}
|
Список | pgsql-odbc |
On 2014/11/13 16:56, Nils Gösche wrote: > Michael wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Nils Gösche <cartan@cartan.de> wrote: > >>> So, should I use the new driver together with this driver option on >>> our customers' servers? I had always left this option at its default >>> value (1), which seems to be the recommended setting. Or is this >>> something that will be fixed in the driver, and I should stick to 9.2.1 >>> for the time being? > >> UseServerSidePrepare default value has been switched from 0 to 1 in >> 09.03.0100, that's btw the value recommended for Postgres 7.4 onwards >> for quite some time. > > Oh! I knew that it had been the recommended value, I just assumed it also must have been the default value, then :-) Soin fact, our software has been running with UseServerSidePrepare=0 all the time. I can make a note for our support peopleto tell every customer who runs into this problem to add this setting to his connection string. > > What I do not quite understand, however, is why it is even necessary for us to deviate from the recommended setting. Isthere anything wrong with the way I am doing the query? Shouldn't it work with UseServerSidePrepare=1 as well? Yes it should work. Currently there are some bugs about handling output parameters. It would be fixed in the next release. regards, Hiroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: