Re: remove pg_standby?
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: remove pg_standby? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5461087E.6090003@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: remove pg_standby? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: remove pg_standby?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/10/2014 07:50 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 11/04/2014 01:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> >> While we're talking about removing old things, is there any use left for >> pg_standby? > > -1. > > A lot of people, a lot of customers use log shipping for various > creative and business requirement setups. Yes, but do they use pg_standby to implement it? If they do, why? pg_standby is more configurable than the built-in standby_mode=on. You can set the sleep time, for example, while standby_mode=on uses a hard-coded delay of 5 s. And pg_standby has a configurable maximum wait time. And as Fujii pointed out, the built-in system will print an annoying message to the log every time it attempts to restore a file. Nevertheless, 99% of users would probably be happy with the built-in thing. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: