Re: recovery_target_time and standby_mode
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: recovery_target_time and standby_mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 545AD9B5.1080307@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | recovery_target_time and standby_mode (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: recovery_target_time and standby_mode
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/05/2014 05:41 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> When the recovery_target_time is reached, switch to streaming >>> replication and stay a standby. >> >> Then shouldn't he just not specify a recovert_target at all? That's >> the default behaviour for standby_mode on, the whole point of >> recovery_target is to specify when to stop recovery and leave standby >> mode, no? > Agreed with Greg, once a target recovery is switched the node gets out > of recovery. What the user should have done here is not specify > recovery_target_time in the standby's recovery.conf such as it follows > the master through streaming. What I'm pointing out is that you can't actually do that. You think you can, but you can't. Instead, what you need to do is: 1) Recover to target_time. 2) Pause 3) shut down the replica 4) replace recovery.conf with one which streams 5) restart replica This is consistent behavior and makes sense when you think about it. So I think what we need to do is clarify in the documentation covering recovery_target and standby_mode that they are exclusive. Hmmm. You know, I think this means we do have a bug. If recovery_target_time and standby_mode are exclusive, we should error if the user attempts to set them both. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: