Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5457F962.70509@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/03/2014 04:44 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 10/29/14 8:42 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I'm sympathetic to that line of reasoning, but I really think that if >> you want to keep this infrastructure, it needs to be made portable. > Let me clarify that this was my intention. I have looked at many test > frameworks, many of which are much nicer than what we have, but the > portability and dependency implications for this project would have been > between shocking and outrageous. I settled for what I felt was the > absolute minimum: Perl + IPC::Run. It was only later on that I learned > that 1) subtests don't work in Perl 5.10, and 2) subtests are broken in > Perl 5.12. So we removed the use of subtests and now we are back at the > baseline I started with. > > The irony in this whole story is that if we had thrown this onto the > build farm right away, we might have found and fixed these problems > within a week instead of five months later. > > An email note to me would probably have done the trick. I've missed one or two things lately, since my mind has been to some extent elsewhere, and don't mind a little memory jog. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: