Re: pg_dump/pg_restore seem broken on hamerkop
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump/pg_restore seem broken on hamerkop |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5450EFE2.7070401@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump/pg_restore seem broken on hamerkop (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/29/2014 12:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: >> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> [Some more code and git-log reading later] I see that the %z is a very >>> recent addition: it only got there as of commit ad5d46a449, of September >>> 5th ... and now I also see that hamerkop's last green run before the >>> failure, on Oct 13rd, did *not* include the pg_upgrade check. So I'm >>> thinking this was broken much earlier than 0eea804. >> Ooohh ... you are right, the first failing build involved not only >> the pg_dump refactoring commit, but an upgrade in the buildfarm script >> that hamerkop was using (from 4.4 to 4.14). So it's entirely possible >> this issue was already there and we just weren't seeing it tested. > hamerkop is still failing in its runs done today. However, I'm not sure > that that proves anything about our hoped-for fix, because the commit SHAs > it's showing on the buildfarm status page are still from Oct 13. It looks > like hamerkop has failed to pull any git updates since it was migrated to > the new buildfarm script version. > > This machine appears to be misconfigured for git. I will email the owner about fixing it. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: