Re: Disk buffering of resultsets
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Disk buffering of resultsets |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54465606.6090602@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Disk buffering of resultsets (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Disk buffering of resultsets
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 10/21/2014 07:06 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > Hi Vitalii, > > Thanks for this. I am headed for pgconf, hopefully I will have time to > look at it on the plane. Great that you're coming. I'm still concerned by this patch, particularly the fact that it doesn't properly use partial result set fetching at the protocol level, or didn't last time I looked. I really think it should be restricted to v3 protocol support and use partial EXECUTE. I'm generally opposed to the idea of the next query incurring the cost of fetching remaining results from the prior one, and possibly throwing an unrelated exception. That's IMO just wrong. I'm not at all convinced we shouldn't be using server-side portals, and possibly a client-supplied helper thread pool. I really don't like hijacking a possibly unrelated thread (that's trying to run the next statement) to do work deferred by a prior connection. Instead we should probably: WARNING: Discarding unfetched results from prior connection HINT: To avoid this warning, explicitly close() the result set or fully read it before running a new statement. or even make it an ERROR. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: