Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5440.1317774763@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> As of fairly recently, the Fedora package also uses pg_ctl for both >> starting and stopping. We've fixed all the reasons that formerly >> existed to avoid use of pg_ctl, and it's a real PITA to try to >> implement the waiting logic at shell level. > OK, that's a good use-case to warrant barrelling ahead with improving > pg_ctl for config-only installs. Did I say that? The Fedora packages don't support config-only arrangements (if you tried, SELinux would likely deny access to whatever directory you chose ...) > What releases do we want to apply that > patch to allow postgres to dump config values and have pg_ctl use them? > This patch is required for old/new installs for pg_upgrade to work. I still think this is a matter for HEAD only. We haven't supported these cases in back branches and so there is little argument for back-patching. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: