Re: Column Redaction
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Column Redaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5437BFDF.9010202@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Column Redaction (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Column Redaction
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/10/2014 02:05 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Heikki Linnakangas (hlinnakangas@vmware.com) wrote: >> On 10/10/2014 01:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: >>> Regarding functions, 'leakproof' functions should be alright to allow, >>> though Heikki brings up a good point regarding binary search being >>> possible in a plpgsql function (or even directly by a client). Of >>> course, that approach also requires that you have a specific item in >>> mind. >> >> It doesn't require that you have a specific item in mind. Binary >> search is cheap, O(log n). It's easy to write a function to do a >> binary search on a single item, passed as argument, and then apply >> that to all rows: >> >> SELECT binary_search_reveal(cardnumber) FROM redacted_table; > > Note that your binary_search_reveal wouldn't be marked as leakproof and > therefore this wouldn't be allowed. If this was allowed, you'd simply > do "raise notice" inside the function and call it a day. *shrug*, just do the same with a more complicated query, then. Even if you can't create a function that does that, you can still execute the same logic without a function. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: