Re: char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text
От | Emi Lu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54354D6F.1080002@encs.concordia.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> >> >> For performance point of view, are there big differences between: >> char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text? >> >> Some comments from google shows: >> No difference, under the hood it's all varlena. Check this article >> from Depesz: >> http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2010/03/02/charx-vs-varcharx-vs-varchar-vs-text/ >> A couple of highlights: >> >> To sum it all up: >> >> * char(n) – takes too much space when dealing with values >> shorter than n, and can lead to subtle errors because of >> adding trailing spaces, plus it is problematic to change the >> limit >> * varchar(n) – it's problematic to change the limit in live >> environment >> * varchar – just like text >> * text – for me a winner – over (n) data types because it lacks >> their problems, and over varchar – because it has distinct name >> >> So, can I assume no big performance differences? >> Thanks alot! >> Emi >> > > > Why do you need to ask if you already have the answer? Depesz is right. Good to hear this. Well, sorry I saw the time is:/2010/03 (might changes for diff/newer versions). Thank you for the confirmation. Emi
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: