Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5432.1109346429@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: >> Yea, probably September, but you can't dump a huge feature on us in >> August either without having talked about it first, so knowing the date >> might not be that helpful. > I thought we were looking at a 12-18 month cycle for 8.1? Which would put > beta around January '06, no? Although we've dropped the idea of letting the ARC problem drive a very short 8.1 cycle, I would still like to see us shoot for a relatively short 8.1 cycle --- less than a year for sure. The main reason is that I think we'll be flushing out performance and feature issues in the Windows port that we cannot reasonably back-patch into 8.0.*. PITR also. In general it seems to me that 8.1 will need to have a consolidation and fill-in-the-blanks flavor after what we did for 8.0, and that will be helped by a shorter devel cycle. As a proposal: feature freeze maybe early summer (June or July), beta maybe Aug/Sep, final as always "when it's ready" (maybe Oct/Nov with a good tailwind). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: