Re: open items for 9.4
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: open items for 9.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 542C0E1C.3050601@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: open items for 9.4 (Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/30/2014 09:10 PM, Gregory Smith wrote: > On 9/29/14, 2:30 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> Can we explain those reasons in the form of documentation? >> Yes. Try and benchmark it. It'll be hardware and workload dependant. > > I missed this whole thing, and eventually I have to circle back to it. > I could do it this week. Ah, that would be great! > Could you (or someone else familiar with the > useful benchmarks) give me more detail on how to replicate one case > where things should improve? I can do that, and I have a lab full of > hardware if it's easier to spot on one type of server. That exercise > will probably lead to a useful opinion on the feature in its final form, > any associated GUC, tunables, and necessary level of associated > documentation in a day or two. To see the most improvement from the patch, try a workload that's otherwise bottlenecked on XLogInsert. For example, with pgbench: psql postgres -c "create table foo (id int4)" pgbench postgres -n -f fooinsert.sql -c 4 -T10 and in the test script: insert into foo select g from generate_series(1, 10000) g; - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: