Re: Last Commitfest patches waiting review
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Last Commitfest patches waiting review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 542969B7.4060703@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Last Commitfest patches waiting review (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/27/2014 05:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes: >> [ unreviewed patches ] > >> Grouping Sets > >> There has been a lot of discussion, but no decisions. See >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/87vbodhtvb.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk. > >> Would a committer be interested to take responsibility of this? If not, >> this will just linger indefinitely. > > I should and will take this, but not in this commitfest: I've been just > horribly busy lately with both work and personal issues. If we can punt > it to the next fest, I will promise to work on it then. Ok, thanks! I moved this to next commitfest and put your name on it as reviewer. >> INNER JOIN removals > >> The latest patch is significantly different from what was originally >> submitted for the commitfest, so I wouldn't feel bad just bumping this >> to the next one. I'll do that unless someone picks this up soon. >> Tom: I know you're busy with the more urgent jsonb patch.. Do you think >> you would find the time to review this anytime soon? Anyone else? > > Same deal here. I marked this as "Returned with feedback", as the trigger-queue issue seems like a show-stopper. >> Selectivity estimation for inet operators > >> I think there's a bug in the estimation of semi-joins, see >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5423DC8D.3080206@vmware.com. But I >> think we could split this patch into two, and commit the non-join >> selectivity estimator first, as that seems OK. If no-one else steps up >> to the plate, I can do that.. > > And I'd like to look this one over too ... Ok, punted this to next commitfest too. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: