Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54266CF1.6080801@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback (<furuyao@pm.nttdata.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/05/2014 08:51 AM, furuyao@pm.nttdata.co.jp wrote: >>> Thanks for the review! >>> >>> I understand the attention message wasn't appropriate. >>> >>> To report the write location, even If you do not specify a replication >> slot. >>> So the fix only appended messages. >>> >>> There was a description of the flush location section of '-S' option, >>> but I intended to catch eye more and added a message. >>> >>> Is it better to make specification of the -S option indispensable? >> >> The patch cannot be applied to HEAD cleanly. Could you update the patch? > > Thank you for pointing out. > Updated the patch. I don't understand what this patch does. When would you want to use the new --reply-fsync option? Is there any reason *not* to use it? In other words, do we need an option for this, couldn't you just always send the feedback message after fsync? - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: