Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54219C3F.8090108@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit. (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/23/2014 06:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 09/23/2014 10:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> Three people have voted for making it an *error* to supply a value >>> that needs to be rounded, instead of changing the rounding behavior. >> Votes or no votes, that's a horrible idea; it breaks the design goal >> that users shouldn't need to remember the precise unit size when making >> postgresql.conf entries. >> >> And I'm not sure what votes you're counting, anyway. People's opinions >> have changed as the discussion proceeded ... > > I don't think I've weighed in on this, and yes, I'm very late to the > party. The "round away from zero" suggestion seemed the simplest and > most easily understood rule to me. +1, rounding up seems better to me as well. Although throwing an error wouldn't be that bad either. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: