Re: better atomics - v0.6
От | Oskari Saarenmaa |
---|---|
Тема | Re: better atomics - v0.6 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54215074.2030707@ohmu.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: better atomics - v0.6 (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: better atomics - v0.6
Re: better atomics - v0.6 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
23.09.2014, 00:01, Andres Freund kirjoitti: > I've finally managed to incorporate (all the?) feedback I got for > 0.5. Imo the current version looks pretty good. > > Most notable changes: > * Lots of comment improvements > * code moved out of storage/ into port/ > * separated the s_lock.h changes into its own commit > * merged i386/amd64 into one file > * fixed lots of the little details Amit noticed > * fixed lots of XXX/FIXMEs > * rebased to today's master > * tested various gcc/msvc versions > * extended the regression tests > * ... > > The patches: > 0001: The actual atomics API I tried building PG on Solaris 10/Sparc using GCC 4.9.0 (buildfarm animal dingo) with this patch but regression tests failed due to: /export/home/os/postgresql/src/test/regress/regress.so: symbol pg_write_barrier_impl: referenced symbol not found which turns out to be caused by a leftover PG_ prefix in ifdefs for HAVE_GCC__ATOMIC_INT64_CAS. Removing the PG_ prefix fixed the build and regression tests. Attached a patch to strip the invalid prefix. > 0002: Implement s_lock.h support ontop the atomics API. Existing > implementations continue to be used unless > FORCE_ATOMICS_BASED_SPINLOCKS is defined Applied this and built PG with and without FORCE_ATOMICS_BASED_SPINLOCKS - both builds passed regression tests. > 0003-0005: Not proposed for review here. Just included because code > actually using the atomics make testing them easier. I'll look at these patches later. / Oskari
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: