Re: Anonymous code block with parameters
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anonymous code block with parameters |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5420D986.4050404@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Anonymous code block with parameters (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/23/2014 07:20 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> >> >> So, to me, DO vs CREATE FUNCTION has nothing to do with passing >> arguments and/or returning data. It has to do with lifespan; single >> call of the function body only, use DO, otherwise, create a function. >> > > Actually same thing happened with the DO implementation itself - > creating anonymous/hidden temporary functions in the background was also > considered but was decided it's not acceptable (for similar reason temp > tables were rejected for WITH). > > So we decided at least twice already that this kind of solution is bad, > I don't know of any change that would invalidate the reasons for > deciding that way so I don't see why they would suddenly become > acceptable... All good points. I was wrong to suggest just going for TEMPORARY FUNCTION before, there's clearly a useful place for DO with parameters. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: