Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 541BCC93.9070204@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 ("Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 19/09/14 17:53, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mark Kirkwood" <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> >> Further to the confusion, here's my 9.3 vs 9.4 on two M550 (one for 9.3 >> one for 9.4), see below for results. >> >> I'm running xfs on them with trim/discard enabled: >> >> $ mount|grep pg >> /dev/sdd4 on /mnt/pg94 type xfs (rw,discard) >> /dev/sdc4 on /mnt/pg93 type xfs (rw,discard) >> >> >> I'm *not* seeing any significant difference between 9.3 and 9.4, and the >> numbers are both about 2x your best number, which is food for thought >> (those P320's should toast my M550 for write performance...). > > cool! any details on OS and other options? I still get the same numbers > as before. > Sorry, Ubuntu 14.04 on a single socket i7 3.4 Ghz, 16G (i.e my workstation). I saw the suggestion that Didier made to run 9.3 on the SSD that you were using for 9.4, and see if it suddenly goes slow - then we'd know it's something about the disk (or filesystem/mount options). Can you test this? Cheers Mark
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: