Re: Differential backup
От | Florian Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Differential backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 541B54F7-94AB-42A4-AB41-F3B2BB05F582@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Differential backup (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 27, 2010, at 16:08 , Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 08:59 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> Why? I must be missing something, because my feeling is that if you >> can't trust your OS to cover something like this, how can you trust >> any application *running* under that OS to do it? > > Good questions. I'm exploring a perceived need. > > I don't think people want this because they think the OS is flaky. It's > more about trusting all of the configurations of all of the filesystems > in use. An explicit mechanism would be more verifiably accurate. It > might just be about control and blame. I believe a reason for people (including me) to not have 100% faith in file modification times are non-monotone system clocks.I've seen more than one system where a cron job running ntpdate every night was used as a poor man's replacement forntpd... So the real advantage of rolling our own solution is the ability to use LSNs instead of timestamps I'd say. best regards, Florian Pflug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: