Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?
| От | cowwoc |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 541B032C.2060300@bbs.darktech.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core? (David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 18/09/2014 9:18 AM, David G Johnston [via PostgreSQL] wrote:
> What distributions of JRE are available on the Windows platform and
> which ones are allowed to be "privately distributed"?
(Answered in a follow-up email to John Pierce)
> For this scenario your target audience is the people, at EnterpriseDB,
> who package the Windows installer. IIRC PostGIS is part of the
> builder - and it is definitely not core maintained - so pl/java should
> be no different.
>
> Each platform is different and the package builders should deal with
> making pl/java easy deploy - but the project itself needs to help
> facilitate that end (through code and documentation). Regardless, the
> core team, for reasons already stated, likely will not and should not
> be the maintainers of pl/java. It needs to be an extension and
> interface with PostgreSQL via the provided mechanisms.
Agreed.
Gili
View this message in context: Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> What distributions of JRE are available on the Windows platform and
> which ones are allowed to be "privately distributed"?
(Answered in a follow-up email to John Pierce)
> For this scenario your target audience is the people, at EnterpriseDB,
> who package the Windows installer. IIRC PostGIS is part of the
> builder - and it is definitely not core maintained - so pl/java should
> be no different.
>
> Each platform is different and the package builders should deal with
> making pl/java easy deploy - but the project itself needs to help
> facilitate that end (through code and documentation). Regardless, the
> core team, for reasons already stated, likely will not and should not
> be the maintainers of pl/java. It needs to be an extension and
> interface with PostgreSQL via the provided mechanisms.
Agreed.
Gili
View this message in context: Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: