Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 541A258F.7070701@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 (Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/17/2014 03:02 PM, Marti Raudsepp wrote: > So instead of: > GroupAggregate > Output: four, ten, hundred, count(*) > Grouping Sets: (onek.four, onek.ten, onek.hundred), (onek.four, > onek.ten), (onek.four), () > > Perhaps print: > Grouping Sets: (onek.four, onek.ten, onek.hundred) > (onek.four, onek.ten) > (onek.four) > () So: Grouping Sets: [ [ onek.four, onek.ten, onek.hundred ], [ onek.four, onek.ten ], [ onek.four ], []] .. in JSON? Seems to me that we need a better way to display the grand total grouping set. > > Or maybe: > Grouping Set: (onek.four, onek.ten, onek.hundred) > Grouping Set: (onek.four, onek.ten) > Grouping Set: (onek.four) > Grouping Set: () The latter won't work with JSON and YAML output. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: