Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5419CE22.8030603@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps (Matthew Kelly <mkelly@tripadvisor.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/17/14 9:07 AM, Matthew Kelly wrote: > Here is where I think the timezone and PostGIS cases are fundamentally different: > I can pretty easily make sure that all my servers run in the same timezone. That's just good practice. I'm also goingto install the same version of PostGIS everywhere in a cluster. I'll build PostGIS and its dependencies from the exactsame source files, regardless of when I build the machine. I wrote time zone *database*, not time zone. The time zone database is (in some configurations) part of glibc. I also wrote PostGIS dependent libraries, not PostGIS itself. If you are comparing RHEL 5 and 6, as you wrote elsewhere, then some of those will most likely be different. (Heck, glibc could be different. Is glibc never allowed to fix insufficiencies in its floating-point implementation, for example?) Also, there is nothing that guarantees that the PostGIS version will be the same on both sides.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: