Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2
От | Marko Tiikkaja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54085B0B.9020408@joh.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/4/14 2:04 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > for example best practices for PL/SQL by Steven Feuerstein I'll spend some time with that book to have a better idea on where you're coming from. Also, *please* don't try and extrapolate what I do based on the code examples on the wiki page; they're all crap just to point out the issues. > We can talk about it - it subjective and I know so there are not only one > style. > > The language has these possibilities. Why to add new redundant? Adding a new alias for every single OUT parameter for every single function seems like a waste of time. It also doesn't improve readability in the way that OUT.foo := 1; does (though I guess you could add an "out_" prefix to all of them). .marko
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: