Re: PL/pgSQL 2
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 540647B0.40900@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 (Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@nosys.es>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/02/2014 02:47 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote: > Yeah, we differ there. I think having an Oracle compatibility layer > in PostgreSQL would be the-next-big-thing we could have. Oracle is has > orders of magnitude bigger user base than postgres has; and having the > ability to attract them would bring us many many more users which, in > turn, would benefit us all very significantly. > > It would be my #1 priority to do in postgres (but yes, I know > -guess- how hard and what resources that would require). But dreaming is > free :) Oracle compatibility certainly has merit, I just don't see it as useful for core. I would be far more interested in MSSQL compatibility honestly. That said, Postgres itself is a rockstar and I think we can make our own case without having to copy others. JD > > Álvaro > > > -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc "If we send our children to Caesar for their education, we should not be surprised when they come back as Romans."
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: