Re: PL/pgSQL 2
От | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54059362.30005@nosys.es обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL 2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/09/14 11:44, Pavel Stehule wrote:
For 9.4, we have the media already saying "Postgres has NoSQL capabilities" (which is only partially true). For x.y we could have the media saying "Postgres adds Oracle compatibility" (which would be only partially true). But that brings a lot of users to postgres, and that helps us all.Partial true can enforce so lot of people will hate postgres too. False promises are wrong
Then let's stop talking about postgres being NoSQL. NoSQL is basically "schema-less" (really bad name) plus "infinite scalability" (which basically means transparent sharding). We fail to provide the latter very clearly...
Álvaro
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: