func.sgml
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | func.sgml |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53fdd499-bb38-6cb0-5792-cce3709ef47d@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: func.sgml
Re: func.sgml Re: func.sgml |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/543620.1629899413%40sss.pgh.pa.us> Tom noted: > You have to be very careful these days when applying stale patches to > func.sgml --- there's enough duplicate boilerplate that "patch' can easily > be fooled into dumping an addition into the wrong place. This is yet another indication to me that there's probably a good case for breaking func.sgml up into sections. It is by a very large margin the biggest file in our document sources (the next largest is less than half the number of lines). thoughts? cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: