Re: Policy query: sponsor endorsements

> The fact that EY in this case has had their logo and endorsement
> posted on every conference presentation the people they sponsored have
> made is not enough?

I'm not in a position to say.  Seems pretty good to me.  On the other
hand, I do have a quote from an EY person ...

>> We do want to "reward" companies for supporting PostgreSQL development,
>> and have in the past noted which companies sponsored certain features.
>> Otherwise this source of development funding will dry up, and it's easy
>> enough for us to give a company a few lines on a web page.
>
> We have? Can you give an example, so we have something to compare to?

Yah, I'll dig.

> I agree it's easy, but you need to figure out exactly who deserves to
> be there. How man lines are 2ndquadrant going to get? Salesforce? EDB?
> VMWare? There needs to be some sort of criteria.
>
> Maybe something like "those things that are listed as major
> enhancements" would work for that - as long as that doesn't send us
> spiraling into a discussion about what gets to be listed under major
> enhancements...

Agreed.

Probably this also means we need to get to overhauling the sponsors page
post-haste.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com