Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53FE0C9C.5000209@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/27/14, 2:23 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Does this make sense? In essence, make the relations work like PL/pgSQL variables do. If you squint a little, the new/oldrelation is a variable from the function's point of view, and a parameter from the planner/executor's point of view.It's just a variable/parameter that holds a set of tuples, instead of a single Datum. Something to keep in mind is that users will definitely think about NEW/OLD as tables. I suspect that it won't be long afterrelease before someone asks why they can't create an index on it. :) -- Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: