Re: pgsql: Implement ALTER TABLE .. SET LOGGED / UNLOGGED
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Implement ALTER TABLE .. SET LOGGED / UNLOGGED |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53F8F390.2050309@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Implement ALTER TABLE .. SET LOGGED / UNLOGGED (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 08/23/2014 12:47 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-08-23 17:28:38 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: >> On 23 August 2014 14:57, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >>> On August 23, 2014 3:49:32 PM CEST, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote: >>>> On 22 August 2014 19:30, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Implement ALTER TABLE .. SET LOGGED / UNLOGGED >>>>> >>>> When moving from unlogged to logged, where do we remove the init fork? >>>> >>>> Couldn't see the keywords fork or init anywhere in the patch, so maybe >>>> its hidden somewhere. >>> A new relfilenode is filled with the data - the old one, including the init fork, gets removed by the normal mechanicsof rewriting rels. >> Why do we do that? Table rewrite takes hours. > There was a long thread about it on -hackers. Doing it without a rewrite > and without loosing transactional semantics is really rather hard. And > having the capability of doing it with a rewrite is better than not > having it at all. > > I think this needs to be documented very clearly and explicitly. My question about the mechanism was similar to Simon's, and I looked in vain for any clue about it in the committed docs. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: