Re: logfile character encoding
От | Redoute |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logfile character encoding |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53F214F5.7040209@tortenboxer.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logfile character encoding (<Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: logfile character encoding
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Am 18.08.2014 15:31, schrieb Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de: > Wikipedia says that UTF-8 is code page 65001, in Microsoft notation > (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_page). Does this help in any way > (i.e. does German_Germany.65001 work for you)? No, I tried that value yesterday, see my answer to Adrian. It seems Unicode encodings are just not target of Windows Locales. Which in my opinion is reasonable: Why should it be a localization issue, how a program writes Unicode to a file? When a localized Windows suggests two different 8bit-charsets for usage (ANSI and OEM), this doesn't hinder a program to write Unicode. Why can't PostgreSQLs "Postmaster" do it? Thanks, Redoute
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: