Re: tuple compare involving NULL
От | Tobias Florek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tuple compare involving NULL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53EB761A.9040301@ibotty.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tuple compare involving NULL (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tuple compare involving NULL
Re: tuple compare involving NULL Re: tuple compare involving NULL |
Список | pgsql-novice |
hi and thank you all for your replies, (you are right, that i had the first example wrong.) unfortunately > SELECT (coalesce(NULL, ''), 2, 'a') > (coalesce(NULL, ''), 1, 'b'); or > (COALESCE(a, -1000), COALESCE(b, -1000)) > (COALESCE(c, -1000), COALESCE(d, -1000)) will only work for specific data types and not, say, integers or dates. maybe a little more context might be helpful. i am trying to have reasonable efficient paging. the query i am building looks like select t.* from table t, (select a, b from table where id = ) q where (q.a, t.b, t.id) > (t.a, q.b, q.id) order by t.a desc, t.b asc, t.id asc limit 10; where t is a table with column id (primary key, serial), a and b. that works fine and efficient (given an index (a,b) on t) without NULLs, but (predictably) not in the presence of NULLs. i would certainly like to handle that better, but i don't have any ideas besides manually expanding the tuple comparison. thank you so far, tobias florek
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: