Re: Hokey wrong versions of libpq in apt.postgresql.org
От | Steve Crawford |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hokey wrong versions of libpq in apt.postgresql.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53EA4E40.9040905@pinpointresearch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Hokey wrong versions of libpq in apt.postgresql.org ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hokey wrong versions of libpq in apt.postgresql.org
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/07/2014 04:30 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Hello, > > I know this has been brought up before: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140724080902.GA28113@msg.df7cb.de For reference, libpq and packaging issues discussed here as well: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/53A304BC.40908@pinpointresearch.com http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/53989C91.6050403@pinpointresearch.com > > But this is just plain wrong. I don't care that the FAQ (on the wiki) > says we are doing it wrong for good reasons. When I (or anyone else) > pulls postgresql-$version-dev, I want the libpq for my version. I do > not want 9.3. > > Yes, it "should" (because of protocol compatibility) work but it > doesn't always (as stated in that email and in a similar problem we > just ran into). > > There can be unintended circumstances on machines when you mix and > match like that. Can we please do some proper packaging on this? +1 Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: