Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup
От | Marco Nenciarini |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53EA23E2.6040306@2ndquadrant.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Il 12/08/14 15:25, Claudio Freire ha scritto: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Marco Nenciarini > <marco.nenciarini@2ndquadrant.it> wrote: >> To declared two files identical they must have same size, >> same mtime and same *checksum*. > > Still not safe. Checksum collisions do happen, especially in big data sets. > IMHO it is still good-enough. We are not trying to protect from a malicious attack, we are using it to protect against some *casual* event. Even cosmic rays have a not null probability of corrupting your database in a not-noticeable way. And you can probably notice it better with a checksum than with a LSN :-) Given that, I think that whatever solution we choose, we should includechecksums in it. Regards, Marco -- Marco Nenciarini - 2ndQuadrant Italy PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support marco.nenciarini@2ndQuadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: