Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53C689FC.5090705@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next? (Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we
do next?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 07/16/2014 07:08 AM, Shaun Thomas wrote: > Hey, > > We performed an upgrade via pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.3 a while back, and I'm almost certain we were bitten by this bug: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140530121631.GE25431@alap3.anarazel.de > > Finding the discussion is nice... but what do we do to fix this? I read through the discussion, and it *seems* we can deletethe 0000 file and restart since it's only an 8k file and we haven't gone far enough to wrap into a new 0000 file. Willthat actually work, though? Or is it too late, since something has already requested that invalid transaction? What dowe do? See here: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/20140702pg_upgrade_fix > > -- > Shaun Thomas > OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604 > 312-676-8870 > sthomas@optionshouse.com > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: