Re: Minmax indexes
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Minmax indexes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 53BEFC7D.2070000@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Minmax indexes (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Minmax indexes
Re: Minmax indexes |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/10/2014 12:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> So I guess the only thing left is to issue a NOTICE when said alter >> > takes place (I don't see that on the patch, but maybe it's there?) > That's not in the patch. I don't think we have an appropriate place to > emit such a notice. What do you mean by "don't have an appropriate place"? The suggestion is that when a user does: ALTER INDEX foo_minmax SET PAGES_PER_RANGE=100 they should get a NOTICE: "NOTICE: changes to pages per range will not take effect until the index is REINDEXed" otherwise, we're going to get a lot of "I Altered the pages per range, but performance didn't change" emails. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: