Re: Request for project mailing list: pgsql-pkg-docker
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Request for project mailing list: pgsql-pkg-docker |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53BEE390.2030100@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Request for project mailing list: pgsql-pkg-docker (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Request for project mailing list: pgsql-pkg-docker
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On 07/10/2014 11:42 AM, Dave Page wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Whilst I agree that that particular question is not appropriate, "Is > project X worthwhile or not" certainly is appropriate, in as much as > worthwhile equates to "having demand from users". I don't care if > individuals think a project is not worthwhile - I do care if no-one > thinks it's worthwhile, or if a lot of people think it is. Right, but it's not relevant whether or not people **on pgsql-www** think it's worthwhile. It's only relevant how popular it is in the world. For example, I think that Windows is a worthless OS which has outlived its usefulness. That doesn't mean I'm going to champion discontinuing the Windows installation packages or their related mailing list; Windows is way too popular for that. Docker is pretty clear-cut: - Over 1 million downloads in the last year - over 2000 downloads of the existing canonical Postgres image since June 1, even though it's not really in a usable state Other projects will be less clear-cut, simply because popularity data isn't available. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: