Re: Questions about daterange() function
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Questions about daterange() function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53AB7379.5080300@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Questions about daterange() function (Ken Tanzer <ken.tanzer@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Questions about daterange() function
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 06/25/2014 05:53 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote: > Hi. I've got lots of tables with start and end dates in them, and I'm > trying to learn how to work with them as date ranges (which seem > fantastic!). I've noticed that the daterange() function seems to create > ranges with an inclusive lower bound, and an exclusive upper bound. For > example: > > SELECT > reg_spc_date, > reg_spc_date_end, > daterange(reg_spc_date,reg_spc_date_end) > FROM reg_spc > LIMIT 5; > > reg_spc_date | reg_spc_date_end | daterange > --------------+------------------+------------------------- > 2012-04-05 | 2013-10-21 | [2012-04-05,2013-10-21) > 2013-10-28 | | [2013-10-28,) > 2013-11-01 | | [2013-11-01,) > 2012-10-19 | 2013-11-01 | [2012-10-19,2013-11-01) > 2005-03-29 | 2013-10-31 | [2005-03-29,2013-10-31) > (5 rows) > > So here are my questions: > > 1) Is there anyway to control this behavior of daterange(), or is it > just best to (for example) add 1 to the upper bound argument if I want > an inclusive upper bound? > > 2) This is purely cosmetic, but is there anyway to control the output > formatting of a daterange to show the upper bound as inclusive? So that > daterange(d1,d2) would display as [d1,d2-1] rather than [d1,d2)? > > 3) I couldn't find this discussed in the documentation, and > specifically didn't find the daterange() function documented, including > on this page where I might have expected it: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/functions-range.html. Is it > somewhere else where I'm not finding it? What version of Postgres are you using? > > Thanks in advance! > > Ken > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: