Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53A35AB3.6010304@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/19/2014 02:44 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> Also, I really hope that nobody is setting this to 10s ... > > Well, we get to decide what the minimum allowed value is. What do > you think that should be? 1s? I don't think that setting it to 1s would ever be a good idea, but I don't want to tie users' hands if they know better than I do. Also, unless we use 1s granuarity, users can't set it to values like 45s, which is more reasonable. I can't see any circumstance under which sub-second values would ever make sense. Now ... can we decrease CPU overhead (wakeups) if we only check once per minute? If so, there's a good argument for making 1min the minimum. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: