Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53A30F69.5040601@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/19/2014 09:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > I think we could mitigate this by allocating the argument context > once in nodeFunctionscan setup, and passing it into > ExecMakeTableFunctionResult; so we'd only do a memory context reset > not a create/delete in each cycle. That would make the patch a bit > more invasive, but not much. > > Back-patchability would depend on whether you think there's any > third party code calling ExecMakeTableFunctionResult; I kinda doubt > that, but I wonder if anyone has a different opinion. Seems unlikely to me. Joe - -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTow9pAAoJEDfy90M199hlFIgQAIh8/65UIWiFzACoprPJI3O1 fLoU3mEAErCw1IE6pl+eYNiUNauvSGoizrDlqFdlcVs6PVbgirjcXYvMKNExkIoz eKooxhb9hsfyV0iK6vDOzCWnvLIuarJJgYnu3lFJw5diEoCAywtUE8o3X3/RScQW glMBiIuiGW2EmYkqBQTSc/lkmKIvCB9rrn1XPymvD2riTFvP466MY7gnt7vFTNjD Cq/9PGTxdXOirSPMvIxUmZkbPOLmucDWJCl5CC8E7mYeG4XDj7YoV8KMn4zRKda9 ZUZk72BXpnsqMak0q+tHa9A9KgMkRB8Sw2YE16/qD6et+jbm1OoiD3prpBEdficZ HQiSL/yyFjCX383ySAZ5AbfAlnnDpfWCgk9xjBWZecIt0GGNzRKBbIvO3+maAIok XcotFHkAcFu4C0ssIJdL58tDOoqwaNshgTn9CUK6g4jqZlny9WF8RcRe6yx2XokY x20oRcA4nZ0bDH6ZvxqBFWK0eAfc15zVH0EZaCWDYxX7LEHyr6dxNtTIj38xBt6d RT5ioKR3k+v/mpTq8xKBedtKWsb3BHhvZ+WnncBOU/tjZJcjC6sEZ89O2rElxJ09 FalqGuioi3gR8YgfbNMAbemEwaPg8OP45ChN/SA3cEjX3OJLqHA/WZNmqO50oLZl M3zNfviiWzHG/OjBxp3o =8S6U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: