Re: Need a better name for MinMax indexes
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Need a better name for MinMax indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53A0E8AC.9080700@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Need a better name for MinMax indexes (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Need a better name for MinMax indexes
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 06/17/2014 02:43 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On Jun 17, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> One of the features for 9.5 will likely be "minmax" indexes, which are >> indexes which index only the upper and lower bounds of each data page, >> making for a very compact index ... like 100MB for a 100GB table. >> >> The working name for these are "minmax" indexes which is not very >> compelling and unlikely to reach users for how cool and useful they are. >> Suggestions on an alternate name? > > At the risk of sounding trite and clichéd: "big data index" or "big table index" - after all, it is an index that you wantto use on a big table. Except that these likely aren't going to be the only "big data indexes" we ever have. Maybe "Compressed Range Indexes"? Pretty wordy, though. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: