Re: UPDATE SET (a,b,c) = (SELECT ...) versus rules

On 06/17/2014 09:43 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On 06/14/2014 09:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > As I mentioned awhile ago, I'm thinking about implementing the
>> > SQL-standard construct
>> >
>> >     UPDATE foo SET ..., (a,b,...) = (SELECT x,y,...), ...
>> >
>> > I've run into a rather nasty problem, which is how does this interact
>> > with expansion of NEW references in ON UPDATE rules?  
>
> Was'nt there a plan (consensus?) about deprecating rules altogether ?

I believe that was just for user access to them, ie CREATE RULE.  I
don't think there was ever question of purging them from the code base.
-- 
Vik