Re: PostgreSQL 15 release announcement draft
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 15 release announcement draft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53983d14-8404-b81e-a53e-1cfec0b6d189@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 15 release announcement draft (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/12/22 3:34 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 12:52:49PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >> sorted. Using `row_number()`, `rank()`, and `count()` as >> [window functions](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/functions-window.html) >> also have performance benefits in PostgreSQL 15, and queries using > > Remove "using" ? I don't think that's the correct change, but I broke up the sentences. I'll post the changes shortly. >> certain operating systems, PostgreSQL 15 supports the ability to >> [prefetch WAL file contents](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-RECOVERY-PREFETCH) >> and speed up recovery times. PostgreSQL's built-in backup command, > > s/and/to/ ? I suppose that is the end goal of the feature, in which case "to" would be correct. I made that adjustment. (I did see tests where recovery time did *not* speed up when prefetching was used, though it may have been due to the knob settings on the tests). >> [`pg_basebackup`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/app-pgbasebackup.html), now >> supports server-side compression of backup files with a choice of gzip, LZ4, and > > s/with/and/ ? I don't think that is correct. >> PostgreSQL 15 includes the SQL standard >> [`MERGE`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-merge.html) command. >> `MERGE` lets you write conditional SQL statements that include `INSERT`, >> `UPDATE`, and `DELETE` actions within a single statement. > > maybe "include combinations of INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE ..." Added "can". > >> PostgreSQL >> [server-level statistics](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/monitoring-stats.html) >> are now collected in shared memory, eliminating both the statistics collector >> process and periodically writing this data to disk. > > and *the need to* periodically write this data to disk ? I don't see what that adds other than extra words, but I can be convinced otherwise. Thanks, Jonathan
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: