Re: slotname vs slot_name

On 06/05/2014 05:09 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I like using "slot_name" everywhere, i.e, even in recovery.conf.
>> primary_slot_name seems not so long name.
>>
>> BTW, what about also renaming pg_llog directory? I'm afraid that
>> a user can confuse pg_log with pg_llog.
>>
>
> Recently I came across this while tab-completing pg_log ;-)
> I remember asking to document pg_llog elsewhere.

+1 for renaming pg_llog. We have all heard the stories of people 
deleting pg_clog because "it's just logs". I feel that pg_llog might be 
an even greater risk at that (although the consequences are not as 
serious as deleting pg_clog.

pg_ldecoding ?


- Heikki