Re: pg_upgrade from 8.3 to 9.1 and Flag --disable-integer-datetimes
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade from 8.3 to 9.1 and Flag --disable-integer-datetimes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5384A3CA.1040509@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_upgrade from 8.3 to 9.1 and Flag --disable-integer-datetimes (Meik Weißbach <meik@itso-berlin.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 05/27/2014 07:29 AM, Meik Weißbach wrote: > Hello all, > > we want to upgrade our database from Postgres 8.3.23 to 9.1.12 using > pg_upgrade. The documentation on pg_upgrade > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/pgupgrade.html) states the > following: > > "Also, the default datetime storage format changed to integer after > PostgreSQL 8.3. pg_upgrade will check that the datetime storage format > used by the old and new clusters match. Make sure your new cluster is > built with the configure flag --disable-integer-datetimes." > > We have a SLES 11 system. We installed Postgres 9.1.12 using Yast. We > assume that our installation was built WITHOUT --disable-integer-datetimes. > > The pg_upgrade is running without any complaints. Since we assume that > our 9.1-server is built without disable-integer-datetimes, we expect > pg_upgrade to fail or giving some kind of notice. > > What is the expected behavior of pg_upgrade in the case that 9.1-server > is not built with with disable-integer-datetimes? > > How do we determine, whether or not a server is built with > disable-integer-datetimes? As the postgres user do something like: pg_controldata /usr/local/pgsql/data/ where the path is $DATA/ for your Postgres install In the output should be: Date/time type storage: 64-bit integers > > Best regards > > Meik Weißbach > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: