Re: I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?

On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
>>>> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
>>>> client utils?  No?
>>>
>>> There are others who think this has already happened.
>>>
>>
>> Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical.
> 
> It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's
> too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't
> particularly like the new name.
>  I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any
> concensus for doing so either.

Ah, I see. There was a name change, and I lost the argument.  Got it.


-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com