Re: Commit ad2a4ae causing more damages than fixes in regression tests
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commit ad2a4ae causing more damages than fixes in regression tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5379D971.1020304@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commit ad2a4ae causing more damages than fixes in regression tests (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
On 05/19/2014 05:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Saito-san, > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi@winpg.jp> wrote: >> Um, it has not been released yet, and it is not in my test case.:-( >> I don't know whether desire it now. However,require in the future. > After some more testing, I am seeing that the diffs in test > catalogfunction that you have introduced with commit ad2a4ae are > reproducible down to 8.4 (didn't go further down): > *** /Users/ioltas/git/pgodbc/test/expected/catalogfunctions.out Fri > May 16 08:13:36 2014 > --- /Users/ioltas/git/pgodbc/test/results/catalogfunctions.out Mon > May 19 11:25:36 2014 > *************** > *** 186,196 **** > contrib_regression public testtab1 _SYSTEM UPDATE YES > contrib_regression public testtab1 _SYSTEM DELETE YES > contrib_regression public testtab1 _SYSTEM REFERENCES YES > - contrib_regression public testtab1 _SYSTEM INSERT YES > - contrib_regression public testtab1 _SYSTEM SELECT YES > - contrib_regression public testtab1 _SYSTEM UPDATE YES > - contrib_regression public testtab1 _SYSTEM DELETE YES > - contrib_regression public testtab1 _SYSTEM REFERENCES YES > Result set: > contrib_regression public testtab1 TABLE > contrib_regression public testtab_fk TABLE > --- 186,191 ---- > > Could you provide the configuration files you have been using for your > tests? I am afraid that I am not able to understand why you are seeing > such diffs. Heikki, are you noticing that? Yep. The expected output in git at the moment is just wrong. > This may be as well a bug in the ODBC code, it is somewhat weird to > see two times the same permission entries for the same table > (testtab1) when calling SQLTablePrivileges. Yeah. If there is a configuration that actually produces that output, then it sure looks like a bug in the code. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: