Re: pg_recvlogical, stdout and SIGHUP
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_recvlogical, stdout and SIGHUP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5374F4DF.2060607@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_recvlogical, stdout and SIGHUP (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/15/2014 07:59 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-05-13 17:43:47 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> On 05/13/2014 04:35 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> On 2014-05-13 16:31:25 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>>> Another thing I noticed is that if when the output goes to a file, the file >>>> isn't re-opened immediately on SIGHUP. Only after receiving some data from >>>> the server. I believe that's also not intentional. >>> >>> Hm. I can't really get excited about that one. Not doing that seems to >>> complicate matters unneccessarily. What's the problem here? >> >> Not sure if it matters in any real-world scenario, but I found it pretty >> surprising while playing with it. It should be trivial to fix; ISTM the >> problem is that there is a "continue" in the loop when select() is >> interrupted by signal, but the re-opening is done after the select() in the >> loop. I think all you need to do is move the check for output_reopen to the >> beginning of the loop. > > Thanks for fixing and sorry for being slow :(. > > Any reason you didn't also move the opening of the output file up? It > seems a bit odd to not have an output file existing every now and > then... No particular reason. But that would actually be a great idea, because currently you won't get any error you give pg_recvlogical an invalid path, until it receives the first piece of data from the server and tries to write it to the file. I'll go and do that. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: