Re: Logical replication woes
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical replication woes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5374F44B.1060003@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Logical replication woes (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logical replication woes
Re: Logical replication woes |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/15/2014 07:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Spotted while testing pg_recvlogical: > > 1. Set up pg_recvlogical to receive: > > ./pg_recvlogical -S fooslot -d postgres --create > ./pg_recvlogical -S fooslot -d postgres --start -f - > > 2. In another terminal, with psql: > > create table foo (id int4); > begin; > insert into foo values (4); > alter table foo alter column id type text; > prepare transaction 'foo'; > commit prepared 'foo'; > insert into foo values (1); > > 3. With current HEAD, after commit > bb38fb0d43c8d7ff54072bfd8bd63154e536b384, this produces an assertion > failure: > > TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(((xid) != ((TransactionId) 0)))", File: > "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 508) > > I believe that's we no longer assign another XID to the transaction that > does the COMMIT PREPARED. Previously, an extra XID, in addition to the > XID of the prepared transaction, was assigned for use in locking the > global transaction entry in shared memory, but that's no longer required. > > However, even with that patch reverted, it doesn't work correctly: > > ERROR: could not map filenode "base/12142/16390" to relation OID > LOG: starting logical decoding for slot fooslot > DETAIL: streaming transactions committing after 0/16D1670, reading WAL > from 0/16BC470 Ok, so the immediate cause was quick to find: when decoding a commit-prepared WAL record, we have to use the XID from the record content (patch attached). The XID in the record header is the XID of the transaction doing the COMMIT PREPARED, which is always 0 after patch bb38fb0d43c8d7ff54072bfd8bd63154e536b384 which causes the assertion. But it was always wrong. After fixing, it no longer asserts or gives the above "could not map filenode" error. However, it still doesn't seem right. When I do the above as a regular transaction, ie: begin; insert into foo values (6); alter table foo alter column id type text; commit; pg_recvlogical prints this: BEGIN 708 table public.foo: INSERT: id[text]:'6' COMMIT 708 But if I do it as a prepared transaction: begin; insert into foo values (7); alter table foo alter column id type text; prepare transaction 'foo'; commit prepared 'foo'; pg_recvlogical prints nothing. - Heikki
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: